Aesthetic Indices in Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses

protetikdistedavisi-10-1-2024-kapak

Ceren Elif KENDİRLİa, Lale KARAAĞAÇLIOĞLUa

aLokman Hekim University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Ankara, Türkiye

ABSTRACT
Patients’ expectation in dental implantology is usually the restoration of lost function and aesthetics. The aesthetic and functional success of implant treatments is closely related to the surrounding hard and soft tissues. When evaluating the planned prosthetic restoration, neighboring teeth, lips, gingiva and environmental factors, as well as the position of the implant, the emergence profile and structure of the gingival tissue, and the anatomical form of the alveolar bone should be taken into consideration. In the literature, aesthetic indices for implant-supported restorations have been found to score some parameters that affect aesthetics in order to plan treatment in accordance with expectations.
Keywords: Esthetics, dental; dental implants; dental prosthesis, implant-supported

Referanslar

  1. Bhuvaneswaran M. Principles of smile design. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):225-32. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  2. Ricciardi MT, Pizzi P. High-risk esthetically driven restoration: begin with the end in mind. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(3):206-10.
  3. Topcu A. Estetik Zonda Gerçekleştirilen Dental İmplant Uygulamalarına İlişkin Hasta Memnuniyetinin Değerlendirilmesi. [Doktora Tezi]. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2014.
  4. Sabri R. The eight components of a balanced smile. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39(3):155-67; quiz 154.
  5. Ünal M, Paken G. Gülümseme Estetiğinde Parametreler: Derleme. AÜDHF dergisi. 2020;47(1-3):213-21.
  6. Uluçam S. Gülüş Bölgesindeki Estetik Kriter ve Limitasyonların Değerlendirilmesi. [Doktora Tezi]. Ankara: Başkent Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.
  7. Yargıcı M, Evlioğlu G. İmplant Destekli Restorasyonlarda Pembe ve Beyaz Estetik. Aydın Dental Journal. 2022;8(2):159-75. [Crossref]
  8. Bilgin E. Dişeti Çekilmeleri ve Biyotipi ile Alveoler Kemik Morfolojisi Arasındaki İlişkinin Araştırılması [Uzmanlık Tezi]. Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi; 2017.
  9. Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface [published correction appears in Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12(5):709]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(4):527-40.
  10. Vidigal GM Jr, Novaes AB Jr, Chevitarese O, de Avillez RR, Groisman M. Evaluation of the implant-connection interface using scanning electron microscopy. Braz Dent J. 1995;6(1):17-23.
  11. Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17(4):326-33.
  12. Hof M, Umar N, Budas N, Seemann R, Pommer B, Zechner W. Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices-Comparative analysis of reliability and validity. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(7):697-706. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  13. Lai HC, Zhang ZY, Wang F, Zhuang LF, Liu X, Pu YP. Evaluation of soft-tissue alteration around implant-supported single-tooth restoration in the anterior maxilla: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(6):560-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  14. Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140-51. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  15. Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM. A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues--the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(6):645-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  16. Li X, Wu B, Cheng X, Li Y, Xie X, Deng F. Esthetic Evaluation of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: The Implant Restoration Esthetic Index and Patient Perception. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e51-e58. [Crossref]
  17. Tettamanti S, Millen C, Gavric J, Buser D, Belser UC, Brägger U, et al. Esthetic Evaluation of Implant Crowns and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in the Anterior Maxilla: Comparison and Reproducibility of Three Different Indices. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(3):517-26. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  18. Dueled E, Gotfredsen K, Trab Damsgaard M, Hede B. Professional and patient-based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(7):729-36. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  19. Hosseini M, Gotfredsen K. A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(4):453-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed]