CORONARY VENOUS SYSTEMAND CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY

Mustafa Ebik1 Gökay Taylan2

1Edirne Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Edirne, Türkiy
2Trakya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Edirne, Türkiye

Ebik M, Taylan G. Coronary Venous System and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. In: Altay S, Akşit E, Kemaloğlu Öz T editor. Coronary Venous System Diseases. 1st ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2025. p.131-141.

ABSTRACT

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is a crucial treatment method that reduces morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients with appropriate indications. The most frequently used method for left ventricular (LV) pacing during CRT implantation is the transvenous placement of the electrode us- ing the coronary venous system (CVS). The most critical factor determining the success of the therapy is the placement of the LV electrode in an optimal location via the CVS. A comprehensive understand- ing of CVS anatomy facilitates successful coronary sinus (CS) cannulation, appropriate target vein selection, and stable lead positioning. Concurrently, it allows for the anticipation of potential difficul- ties encountered during the procedure and the prevention or effective management of possible compli- cations. The CVS anatomy exhibits significantly higher variability compared to the coronary arterial system. This high variability rate can lead to significant challenges during interventional procedures such as CRT implantation. Therefore, imaging modalities such as venography, CT, and MRI are used for preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. Optimal vein selection involves several crite- ria including anatomical suitability (lateral/posterolateral, non-apical positions), electrical delay (long Q-LV interval), lead stability, avoidance of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), and distance from scar tissue. Procedural complications include coronary venous dissection/perforation, cardiac tamponade, lead dislodgement, and infection. Although technological advances have improved procedural suc- cess rates, the fundamental elements of CRT success remain clinical assessment, accurate anatomical evaluation, and an experienced team-based approach. Mastery of CVS anatomy and patient-centered strategies are indispensable for maximizing the benefits of CRT treatment and increasing patient safety.

Keywords: Coronary venous system; Cardiac resynchronization Tterapy; Coronary sinus; Heart failure; Coronary vein selection; Coronary venous challenges; Coronary vein complications

Referanslar

  1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3627-3639. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  2. Glikson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(35):3427-3520. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  3. Nakai T, Ikeya Y, Kogawa R, Okumura Y. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Current status and near-future prospects. J Cardiol. 2022;79(3):352-357. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  4. Heydari B, Jerosch-Herold M, Kwong RY. Imaging for planning of cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(1):93-110. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  5. Pothineni NVK, Supple GE. Navigating Challenging Left Ventricular Lead Placements for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020;11(5):41074117. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  6. Borgquist R, Wang L. Anatomy of the coronary sinus with regard to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022;33(2):186-194. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  7. Butter C, Georgi C, Stockburger M. Optimal CRT Implantation-Where and How To Place the Left-Ventricular Lead? Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2021;18(5):329-344. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  8. Shah SS, Teague SD, Lu JC, Dorfman AL, Kazerooni EA, Agarwal PP. Imaging of the coronary sinus: normal anatomy and congenital abnormalities. Radiographics. 2012;32(4):991-1008. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  9. Singh JP, Houser S, Heist EK, Ruskin JN. The coronary venous anatomy: a segmental approach to aid cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(1):68-74. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  10. Zehan IG, Eötvös CA, Moldovan MP, Andrei MG, ȘchiopȚentea CP, Lazar RD, et al. Angiographic Anatomy of the Left Coronary Veins: Beyond Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025;27(1):58. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  11. Gach-Kuniewicz B, Goncerz G, Ali D, Kacprzyk M, Zarzecki M, Loukas M, et al. Variations of coronary sinus tributaries among patients undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2023;82(2):282-290. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  12. Kaufmann J, Gerds-Li JH, Kriatselis C, Fleck E, Goetze S. Three-dimensional rotational venography of the coronary sinus tree facilitates left ventricular lead implantation for CRT. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;42(2):125-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  13. Gerrits W, Danad I, Velthuis B, Mushtaq S, Cramer MJ, van der Harst P, et al. Cardiac CT in CRT as a Singular Imaging Modality for Diagnosis and Patient-Tailored Management. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6212. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  14. Bleeker GB, Yu CM, Nihoyannopoulos P, de Sutter J, Van Ebik, Taylan Coronary Venous System and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy de Veire N, Holman ER, et al. Optimal use of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Heart. 2007;93(11):1339-50. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  15. Tang H, Tang S, Zhou W. A Review of Image-guided Approaches for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2017;6(2):69-74. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  16. Barwad P, Kaur N, Sihag BK, Naganur SH. Long-term outcome of variety of techniques used to stabilize left ventricular lead in difficult coronary sinus anatomyA single centre experience. Indian Heart J. 2024;76(5):327-332. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  17. Allison JD Jr, Biton Y, Mela T. Determinants of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022;13(5):4994-5003. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  18. Roka A, Borgquist R, Singh J. Coronary Sinus Lead Positioning. Heart Fail Clin. 2017;13(1):79-91. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  19. Nguyên UC, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K. Left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Current data and potential explanations for the lack of benefit. Heart Rhythm. 2024;21(2):197-205. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  20. Keilegavlen H, Hovstad T, Færestrand S. Active fixation of a thin transvenous left-ventricular lead by a side helix facilitates targeted and stable placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2016;18(8):1235-40. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  21. Van Everdingen WM, Cramer MJ, Doevendans PA, Meine M. Quadripolar Leads in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1(4):225-237. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  22. Chung MK, Patton KK, Lau CP, Dal Forno ARJ, Al-Khatib SM, Arora V, et al. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. Heart Rhythm. 2023;20(9):e17-e91.
  23. Farhangee A, Davies MJ, Gaughan K, Mesina M, Mîndrilă I. Observational Study of Trans-Septal Endocardial Left Ventricle Lead Implant for Effective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Challenging Coronary Sinus Anatomy. Biomedicines. 2024;12(12):2693. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  24. Canpolat U, Şahiner L, Aytemir K, Oto A. Femoral vein guidance for pipe-shaped coronary sinus cannulation and epicardial left ventricular lead placement using left subclavian vein approach. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2012;40(3):251-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  25. Nemer DM, Patel DR, Madden RA, Wilkoff BL, Rickard JW, Tarakji KG, et al. Comparative Analysis of Procedural Outcomes and Complications Between De Novo and Upgraded Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(1):62-72. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  26. Gamble JHP, Herring N, Ginks M, Rajappan K, Bashir Y, Betts TR. Procedural Success of Left Ventricular Lead Placement for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Meta-Analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2(1):69-77. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  27. Hsu JC, Varosy PD, Bao H, Dewland TA, Curtis JP, Marcus GM. Coronary Venous Dissection from Left Ventricular Lead Placement During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Defibrillator Implantation and Associated in-Hospital Adverse Events (from the NCDR ICD Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2018;121(1):55-61. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  28. Chahine J, Baranowski B, Tarakji K, Gad MM, Saliba W, Rickard J, et al. Cardiac venous injuries: Procedural profiles and outcomes during left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(8):1298-1303. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  29. Rijal S, Wolfe J, Rattan R, Durrani A, Althouse AD, Marroquin OC, Jain S, Mulukutla S, Saba S. Lead related complications in quadripolar versus bipolar left ventricular leads. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017;17(1):3-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  30. Cronin EM. Coronary Venous Lead Extraction. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 Jun 15;8(6):2758-2764. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  31. Leyva F, Zegard A, Qiu T, Acquaye E, Ferrante G, Walton J, et al. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(10):e007026. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]