Digital Impression Technologies in Dentistry: Intraoral Scanners and Desktop Scanners

Hande Gültekin1, Elif Tuba Akçin2
1Doctoral Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lokman Hekim University, Çankaya, Ankara, Türkiye
2Assistant professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lokman Hekim University, Çankaya, Ankara, Türkiye

ABSTRACT
Today, with the rapid advancement of technological developments in the field of dentistry, digital scanners allow easier and more precise scanning of teeth and surrounding tissues. Digital scanners are devices that help create 3D digital models by scanning the teeth in the mouth. These devices provide dentists with many advantages. The use of digital scanners allows dentists to make a more accurate diagnosis and create a bet-ter treatment plan. It also facilitates communication between dentists and patients and makes the treatment process more comfortable. In addition, the use of digital scanners is faster and more hygienic than traditional dental impressions. Thanks to the development and usage of this technology, digital transformation have been initiated by dentists with providing better patient treatment experience.
Keywords: Digital Impression, Intraoral Scanner, Desktop Scanner

Referanslar

  1. Çağlar İ, Duymuş ZY, Sabit A. Diş hekimliğinde kullanilan ölçü sistemlerinde güncel yaklaşimlar: Dijital ölçü. Atatürk üniversitesi diş hekimliği fakültesi dergisi. 2015;25:135-140. [Crossref]
  2. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clinical oral investigations. 2013;17:1201-1208. [Crossref]
  3. Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, Att W. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2013;144(8):914-920. [Crossref]
  4. Ekici Z. Aynı sisteme ait farklı bilgisayar destekli ölçü yöntemlerinin farklı restorasyonların uyumuna etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Uzmanlık Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2018.[2023]. [Link]
  5. Joda T, Katsoulis J, Brägger U. Clinical fitting and adjustment time for implant-supported crowns comparing digital and conventional workflows. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2016;18(5):946-954. [Crossref]
  6. Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2020;64(2):109-113. [Crossref]
  7. Miyoshi K, Tanaka S, Yokoyama S, Sanda M, Baba K. Effects of different types of intraoral scanners and scanning ranges on the precision of digital implant impressions in edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2020;31(1):74-83. [Crossref]
  8. Zhang Y, Tian J, Wei D, Di P, Lin Y. Quantitative clinical adjustment analysis of posterior single implant crown in a chairside digital workflow: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical oral implants research. 2019;30(11):1059-1066. [Crossref]
  9. Sezer T. İntraoral Tarayıcılar İle Alınan Dijital İmplant Ölçülerin Doğruluğu. Sağlık & Bilim 2022: Medikal Araştırmalar-IV. 2023:79.
  10. Wulfman C, Bonnet G, Carayon D, Batisse C. Digital removable complete denture: A narrative review. Fr J Dent Med. 2020;10:1-9.
  11. D'Arienzo LF, Borracchini A. Comparison of the suitability of intra-oral scanning with conventional impression of edentulous maxilla in vivo. A preliminary study. Journal of Osseointegration. 2018;10(4):115-120.
  12. Hack G, Liberman L, Vach K, Tchorz JP, Kohal RJ, Patzelt SB. Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws-An in vivo feasibility study. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2020;64(4):444-453. [Crossref]
  13. Fueki K, Inamochi Y, Wada J, Arai J., Takaichi A., Murakami N, et al. A systematic review of digital removable partial dentures. Part I: Clinical evidence, digital impression, and maxillomandibular relationship record. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2022;66(1):40-52. [Crossref]
  14. Schmidt MB, Rauch A, Schwarzer M, Lethaus B, Hahnel S. Combination of digital and conventional workflows in the CAD/CAM-Fabrication of an implant-supported overdenture. Materials. 2020;13(17):3688. [Crossref]
  15. Güncü M, Aktaş G, Uluç İ. Direkt ve İndirekt Dijitalizasyon ile Üretilen 5 Üyeli Monolitik Zirkonya Restorasyonların Marjinal ve İnternal Uyumunun 3 Boyutlu Karşılaştırması: İn Vitro Çalışma.Ankara. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi.Uzmanlık tezi.2020. [2023]. [Link]
  16. Berrendero S, Salido MP, Ferreiroa A, Valverde A, Pradíes G. Comparative study of all-ceramic crowns obtained from conventional and digital impressions: clinical findings. Clinical oral investigations. 2019;23:1745-1751. [Crossref]
  17. Bosniac P, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo. Clinical oral investigations. 2019;23:2421-2427. [Crossref]
  18. Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, Gütermann JN, Özcan M, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. Mar 2019;121(3):426-431. [Crossref]
  19. Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C, Admakin O. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. BMC oral health. 2019;19(1):1- 14. [Crossref]
  20. Tan MY, Yee SHX, Wong KM, Tan YH, Tan KBC. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2019;34 2:366-380. [Crossref]
  21. Flügge T, van der Meer WJ, Gonzalez BG, Vach K, Wismeijer D, Wang P. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2018;29:374-392. [Crossref]
  22. Zhang Y-J, Shi J-Y, Qian S-J, Qiao S-C, Lai H-C. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review. Int J Oral Implantol. 2021;14(2):157-179.
  23. Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015;24(4):313-321. [Crossref]
  24. Pulluru M, Karre D, Swarna Swathi S, Penmetcha S, Sampath R, Sai Prannoy N. Intraoral Digital Scanners-An Overview. JD S. 2018;6(1):38-43.
  25. Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR. Intraoral digital scanners. J Clin Orthod. 2014;48(6):337-47.
  26. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics-Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54:203-221. [Crossref]
  27. Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Sanohkan S. Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners. BioMed research international. 2021. 2673040. [Crossref]
  28. Aydin Z, Yanikoğlu N. Farklı Dijital Tarayıcılar ile Elde Edilen Ölçülerden CAD-CAM Sistemi ile Hazırlanan Zirkonya ile Güçlendirilmiş Lityum Silikat Kuronların Marjinal ve İnternal Aralıklarının Değerlendirilmesi: İn Vitro Bir Çalışma. Turkiye Klinikleri Dishekimligi Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;28(3):650-659. [Crossref]
  29. Maden H. Diş Hekimliği Klinik Uygulamalarında Dijital Teknolojilerin Yeri.Uzmanlık tezi.İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi; 2022.[2023]. [Link]
  30. Hategan SI, Ionel TF, Goguta L, Gavrilovici A, Negrutiu ML, Jivanescu A. Powder and powder-free intra-oral scanners: Digital impression accuracy. Primary dental journal. 2018;7(2):40-43. [Crossref]
  31. Bakıç H, Kocacıklı M, Korkmaz T. Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel İntraoral Tarayicilar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;31(2):289-304. [Crossref]
  32. 3Shape trios 5-Hijyenik ve Kullanımı Kolay Ağız İçi Tarayıcı. 3Shape. (n.d.). [Erişim tarihi: 23 Nisan 2023] [Link]
  33. Róth I, Czigola A, Fehér D, Vitai V, Joós-Kovács G, Hermann P, et al. Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):140. [Crossref]
  34. DeLong R, Heinzen M, Hodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res. Jun 2003;82(6):438-42. [Crossref]
  35. Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2006;95(3):194-200. [Crossref]
  36. Vlaar ST, van der Zel JM. Accuracy of dental digitizers. Int Dent J. Oct 2006;56(5):301-9. [Crossref]
  37. Ural Ç, Kaleli N. Direct digitalization devices in today's dental practice: Lab scanners an update and review. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine. 2021;38. [Crossref]
  38. Erozan Ç. Dijital diş hekimliğinde farklı intraoral tarayıcıCAD yazılımı kombinasyonlarının hassasiyetlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Doktora tezi. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2019.[2023]. [Link]
  39. Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touchprobe scanner. J Prosthet Dent. Mar 2006;95(3):194-200. [Crossref]
  40. Al-Jubuori O, Azari A. An introduction to dental digitizers in dentistry. A systematic review. J Chem Pharm Res. 2015;7(8):10-20.
  41. Lee J-J, Jeong I-D, Park J-Y, Jeon J-H, Kim J-H, Kim W-C. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2017;117(2):253-259. [Crossref]
  42. Jeon J-H, Choi B-Y, Kim C-M, Kim J-H, Kim H-Y, Kim W-C. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white-and blue-light scanners. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2015;114(4):549-553. [Crossref]