PERSPECTIVES ON DIGITAL DENTISTRY

digital_dentistryesra_kulkapak

DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN ENDODONTICS

Meltem Sümbüllü

Atatürk University, Faculty Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Erzurum, Türkiye

Sümbüllü M. Digital Technology in Endodontics. In: Kul E, editor. Perspectives on Digital Dentistry. 1st ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2025. p.5566.

ABSTRACT

The rise of digital technologies in dentistry has brought about a significant transformation in diagnos tic and treatment processes. Traditional methods have been replaced by computeraided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), threedimensional (3D) printing, and artificial intelligencebased analyses, introducing innovations that enhance clinical success in various fields of dentistry, including endodontics.

One of the major challenges in endodontic treatment is the accurate identification of complex root canal morphologies and the execution of minimally invasive procedures. While conventional radio graphic techniques provide only limited twodimensional images, advanced imaging systems, such as CBCT, enable the 3D examination of root canal anatomy. Furthermore, the direct integration of digital data into CAD software has facilitated the development of patientspecific guides and biocompatible restorations.

In recent years, the integration of 3D printing technology into endodontics has brought groundbreaking innovations in areas such as the creation of anatomical models, design of surgical guides, and bioengi neering applications. Especially in regenerative endodontic approaches, the production of biocompati ble scaffold systems using 3D printing has great potential for tissue engineering.

This chapter provides a comprehensive analysis of digital advancements in endodontics, including guided endodontic procedures, 3D printing for autotransplantation, developments in preclinical appli cations, clinical implementations, and future innovations. The advantages of digitalization in endodon tics and the current limitations are also discussed.

Keywords: 3Dimensional printing; Autotransplantation; Calcified canal; Digital dentistry; Guided endodontics; Guided endodontic access cavity; Surgical guide; Tissue engineering

Referanslar

  1. Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J, Schlegel KA, Eitner S. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method a combined in vivo in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38(7):488-493. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  2. Connert T, Zehnder MS, Weiger R, Kühl S, Krastl G. Microguided Endodontics: Accuracy of a Miniaturized Technique for Apically Extended Access Cavity Preparation in Anterior Teeth. J Endod. 2017;43(5):787-790. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  3. Moreno-Rabié C, Torres A, Lambrechts P, Jacobs R. Clinical applications, accuracy and limitations of guided endodontics: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2020;53(2):214-231. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  4. Connert T, Weiger R, Krastl G. Present status and future directions Guided endodontics. Int Endod J. 2022;55 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):995-1002. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  5. Connert T, Zehnder MS, Amato M, Weiger R, Kühl S, Krastl G. Microguided Endodontics: a method to achieve minimally invasive access cavity preparation and root canal location in mandibular incisors using a novel computer-guided technique. Int Endod J. 2018;51(2):247-255. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  6. Yimarj P, Subbalekha K, Dhanesuan K, Siriwatana K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(6):672-678. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  7. Kühl S, Payer M, Zitzmann NU, Lambrecht JT, Filippi A. Technical accuracy of printed surgical templates for guided implant surgery with the coDiagnostiX TM software. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17 Suppl 1(S1):e177-e182. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  8. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:92-109. Accessed February 3, 2025. [Link]
  9. Krug R, Reich S, Connert T, Kess S, Soliman S, Reymus M, et. al. Guided endodontics: a comparative in vitro study on the accuracy and effort of two different planning workflows. Int J Comput Dent. 2020;23:119-128. [PubMed]
  10. Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomó-Coll O, Wang H lay. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann Anat. 2019;225:1-10. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  11. D GT, Saxena P, Gupta S. Static vs. dynamic navigation for endodontic microsurgery A comparative review. J oral Biol craniofacial Res. 2022;12(4):410-412. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  12. Afrashtehfar KI, Jurado CA, Moshaverınıa A. Dynamic navigation may be used for most implant surgery scenarios due to its satisfactory accuracy. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(4). [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  13. Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomó-Coll O, Wang H lay. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann Anat. 2019;225:1-10. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  14. Nikoui M, Kenny DJ, Barrett EJ. Clinical outcomes for permanent incisor luxations in a pediatric population. III. Lateral luxations. Dent Traumatol. 2003;19(5):280-285. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  15. Krastl G, Weiger R, Filippi A, et al. Endodontic management of traumatized permanent teeth: a comprehensive review. Int Endod J. 2021;54(8):1221-1245. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  16. Kiefner P, Connert T, ElAyouti A, Weiger R. Treatment of calcified root canals in elderly people: a clinical study about the accessibility, the time needed and the outcome with a three-year follow-up. Gerodontology. 2017;34(2):164-170. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  17. Connert T, Krug R, Eggmann F, et al. Guided Endodontics versus Conventional Access Cavity Preparation: A Comparative Study on Substance Loss Using 3-dimensional-printed Teeth. J Endod. 2019;45(3):327-331. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  18. Krastl G, Zehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Kühl S. Guided Endodontics: a novel treatment approach for teeth with pulp canal calcification and apical pathology. Dent Traumatol. 2016;32(3):240-246. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  19. Shi X, Zhao S, Wang W, Jiang Q, Yang X. Novel navigation technique for the endodontic treatment of a molar with pulp canal calcification and apical pathology. Aust Endod J. 2018;44(1):66-70. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  20. Mena-Álvarez J, Rico-Romano C, Lobo-Galindo AB, Zubizarreta-Macho Á. Endodontic treatment of dens evaginatus by performing a splint guided access cavity. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(6):396-402. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  21. Kvınnsland I, Oswald RJ, Halse A, Grønnıngsæter AG. A clinical and roentgenological study of 55 cases of root perforation. Int Endod J. 1989;22(2):75-84. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  22. van der Meer WJ, Vissink A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. 3D Computer aided treatment planning in endodontics. J Dent. 2016;45:67-72. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  23. Buchgreitz J, Buchgreitz M, Mortensen D, Bjørndal L. Guided access cavity preparation using cone-beam computed tomography and optical surface scans an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2016;49(8):790-795. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  24. Zehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Krastl G, Kühl S. Guided endodontics: accuracy of a novel method for guided access cavity preparation and root canal location. Int Endod J. 2016;49(10):966-972. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  25. Jiang Q, Huang Y, Tu XR, Li Z, He Y, Yang X. Biomechanical Properties of First Maxillary Molars with Different Endodontic Cavities: A Finite Element Analysis. J Endod. 2018;44(8):1283-1288. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  26. Loureiro MAZ, Elias MRA, Capeletti LR, et al. Guided Endodontics: Volume of Dental Tissue Removed by Guided Access Cavity Preparation-An Ex Vivo Study. J Endod. 2020;46(12):1907-1912. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  27. Buchgreitz J, Buchgreitz M, Bjørndal L. Guided root canal preparation using cone beam computed tomography and optical surface scans an observational study of pulp space obliteration and drill path depth in 50 patients. Int Endod J. 2019;52(5):559-568. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  28. Alfadda A, Alfadley A, Jamleh A. Fiber Post Removal Using a Conservative Fully Guided Approach: A Dental Technique. Case Rep Dent. 2022;2022. J, Ramírez-Salomón M, Vega-Lizama E, et al. Endodontic Retreatment Using Dynamic Navigation: A Case Report. J Endod. 2021;47(6):1007-1013. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  29. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V, Del Fabbro M. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated metaanalysis of the literature. J Endod. 2013;39(3):332-339. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  30. Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod. 2006;32(7):601-623. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  31. Popowicz W, Palatyńska-Ulatowska A, Kohli MR. Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: Computed Tomography-based Guided Stent Approach with Platelet-rich Fibrin Graft: A Report of 2 Cases. J Endod. 2019;45(12):1535-1542. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  32. Pinsky HM, Champleboux G, Sarment DP. Periapical surgery using CAD/CAM guidance: preclinical results. J Endod. 2007;33(2):148-151. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  33. Giacomino CM, Ray JJ, Wealleans JA. Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: A Novel Approach to Anatomically Challenging Scenarios Using 3-dimensional-printed Guides and Trephine Burs-A Report of 3 Cases. J Endod. 2018;44(4):671-677. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  34. Anderson J, Wealleans J, Ray J. Endodontic applications of 3D printing. Int Endod J. 2018;51(9):1005-1018. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  35. Fan S, Hung K, Bornstein MM, Huang W, Wang F, Wu Y. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):85-90. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  36. Liu Y, Liao W, Jin G, Yang Q, Peng W. Additive manufacturing and digital design assisted precise apicoectomy: A case study. Rapid Prototyp J. 2014;20(1):33-40. [Crossref]
  37. Strbac GD, Schnappauf A, Giannis K, Bertl MH, Moritz A, Ulm C. Guided Autotransplantation of Teeth: A Novel Method Using Virtually Planned 3-dimensional Templates. J Endod. 2016;42(12):1844-1850. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  38. Patel S, Aldowaisan A, Dawood A. A novel method for soft tissue retraction during periapical surgery using 3D technology: a case report. Int Endod J. 2017;50(8):813-822. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  39. Tsukiboshi M. Autotransplantation of teeth: requirements for predictable success. Dent Traumatol. 2002;18(4):157-180. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  40. Verweij JP, Jongkees FA, Anssari Moin D, Wismeijer D, van Merkesteyn JPR. Autotransplantation of teeth using computer-aided rapid prototyping of a three-dimensional replica of the donor tooth: a systematic literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(11):1466-1474. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  41. Kim K, Choi HS, Pang NS. Clinical application of 3D technology for tooth autotransplantation: A case report. AustEndod J. 2019;45(1):122-128. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  42. Lee SJ, Jung IY, Lee CY, Choi SY, Kum KY. Clinical application of computer-aided rapid prototyping for tooth transplantation. Dent Traumatol. 2001;17(3):114-119. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  43. Lee SJ, Kim E. Minimizing the extra-oral time in autogeneous tooth transplantation: use of computer-aided rapid prototyping (CARP) as a duplicate model tooth. Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37(3):136. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  44. Anssari Moin D, Derksen W, Verweij JP, Van Merkesteyn R, Wismeijer D. A Novel Approach for Computer-Assisted Template-Guided Autotransplantation of Teeth With Custom 3D Designed/Printed Surgical Tooling. An Ex Vivo Proof of Concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(5):895-902. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  45. Keightley AJ, Cross DL, McKerlie RA, Brocklebank L. Autotransplantation of an immature premolar, with the aid of cone beam CT and computer-aided prototyping: a case report. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26(2):195-199. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  46. Honda M, Uehara H, Uehara T, et al. Use of a replica graft tooth for evaluation before autotransplantation of a tooth. A CAD/ CAM model produced using dental-cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(10):1016-1019. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  47. Höhne C, Schwarzbauer R, Schmitter M. 3D Printed Teeth with Enamel and Dentin Layer for Educating Dental Students in Crown Preparation. J Dent Educ. 2019;83(12):1457-1463. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  48. Marty M, Broutin A, Vergnes JN, Vaysse F. Comparison of student's perceptions between 3D printed models versus series models in paediatric dentistry hands-on session. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23(1):68-72. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  49. Reymus M, Fotiadou C, Hickel R, Diegritz C. 3D-printed model for hands-on training in dental traumatology. Int Endod J. 2018;51(11):1313-1319. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  50. Boonsiriphant P, Al-Salihi Z, Holloway JA, Schneider GB. The Use of 3D Printed Tooth Preparation to Assist in Teaching and Learning in Preclinical Fixed Prosthodontics Courses. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e545-e547. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  51. Dimitrijevic T, Kahler B, Evans G, Collins M, Moule A. Depth and distance perception of dentists and dental students. Oper Dent. 2011;36(5):467-477. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  52. Pouhaër M, Picart G, Baya D, et al. Design of 3D-printed macro-models for undergraduates' preclinical practice of endodontic access cavities. Eur J Dent Educ. 2022;26(2):347-353. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  53. Kim E, Kim KD, Roh BD, Cho YS, Lee SJ. Computed tomography as a diagnostic aid for extracanal invasive resorption. J Endod. 2003;29(7):463-465. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  54. Lee SJ, Jang KH, Spangberg LSW, et al. Three-dimensional visualization of a mandibular first molar with three distal roots using computer-aided rapid prototyping. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101(5):668-674. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  55. Kfir A, Telishevsky-Strauss Y, Leitner A, Metzger Z. The diagnosis and conservative treatment of a complex type 3 dens invaginatus using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D plastic models. Int Endod J. 2013;46(3):275-288. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  56. Marending M, Biel P, Attin T, Zehnder M. Comparison of two contemporary rotary systems in a pre-clinical student course setting. Int Endod J. 2016;49(6):591-598. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  57. Mohmmed SA, Vianna ME, Hilton ST, Boniface DR, Ng YL, Knowles JC. Investigation to test potential stereolithography materials for development of an in vitro root canal model. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(2):202-210. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  58. Mohmmed SA, Vianna ME, Penny MR, Hilton ST, Knowles JC. The effect of sodium hypochlorite concentration and irrigation needle extension on biofilm removal from a simulated root canal model. Aust Endod J. 2017;43(3):102-109. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  59. Mohmmed SA, Vianna ME, Penny MR, Hilton ST, Mordan NJ, Knowles JC. Investigations into in situ Enterococcus faecalis biofilm removal by passive and active sodium hypochlorite irrigation delivered into the lateral canal of a simulated root canal model. Int Endod J. 2018;51(6):649-662. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  60. Xu HHK, Wang P, Wang L, et al. Calcium phosphate cements for bone engineering and their biological properties. Bone Res. 2017;5. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  61. Murray PE, Garcia-Godoy F, Hargreaves KM. Regenerative endodontics: a review of current status and a call for action. J Endod. 2007;33(4):377-390. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  62. Sanjana NE, Fuller SB. A fast flexible ink-jet printing method for patterning dissociated neurons in culture. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;136(2):151-163. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  63. Atila D, Kumaravel V. Advances in antimicrobial hydrogels for dental tissue engineering: regenerative strategies for endodontics and periodontics. Biomater Sci. 2023;11(20):6711-6747. [Crossref]  [PubMed]