ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)FORGASTROINTESTINALSURGERY

Esin Şair

Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, İstanbul, Türkiye

Şair E. Ethical and Legal Considerations in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Gastrointestinal Surgery. Çaycı HM, ed. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Gastrointestinal Surgery. 1st ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2025. p.23-32.

ABSTRACT

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has been swiftly progressing, reshaping the landscape of medical practice. Its influence on surgery has been substantial, making it an essential component in planning, training, and procedural environments. The diverse range of AI software profoundly impacts medical ethics and relevant legal frameworks. This essay’s core objective is to thoroughly investigate AI from both ethical and legal perspectives. By focusing on the domain of gastrointestinal surgery, it aims to highlight AI’s transformative potential while proposing suitable solutions and preventative measures. Recognizing ethical dilemmas is critical due to concerns about AI technology implications. With AI’s growing role in diagnostics and surgery, dialogue on these issues is vital. It’s important to assess the evolving legal context, especially EU regulations, and to remain aware of legal risks and penalties.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Ethical consideration; Legal consideration; Gastrointestinal surgery

Referanslar

  1. Cobianchi L, Verde JM, Loftus TJ, Piccolo D, Dal Mas F, Mascagni P, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Surgery: Ethical Dilemmas and Open Issues. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Aug 1;235(2):268-275. Epub 2022 Apr 21. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  2. Solanki SL, Pandrowala S, Nayak A, Bhandare M, Ambulkar RP, Shrikhande SV. Artificial intelligence in perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries. World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 7;27(21):2758-2770. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  3. Vesnic-Alujevic L, Nascimento S, Polvora A. Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: critical notes on European policy frameworks. Telecommun Policy. 2020. [Crossref]
  4. Barragán-Montero A, Javaid U, Valdés G, Nguyen D, Desbordes P, Macq B, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review. Phys Med. 2021 Mar;83:242-256. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  5. Ali H, Muzammil MA, Dahiya DS, Ali F, Yasin S, Hanif W, et al. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comprehensive review. Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 MarApr;37(2):133-141. [Crossref]
  6. Solanki SL, Pandrowala S, Nayak A, Bhandare M, Ambulkar RP, Shrikhande SV. Artificial intelligence in perioperative management of major gastrointestinal surgeries. World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 7;27(21):2758-2770. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  7. Leslie D. Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: a guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector. The Alan Turing Institute. 2019. [Crossref]
  8. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, NY. Oxford University Press; 2013. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  9. Weidener L, Fischer M. Role of Ethics in Developing AIBased Applications in Medicine: Insights From Expert Interviews and Discussion of Implications. JMIR AI. 2024 Jan 12;3:e51204. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  10. Sung JJY, Savulescu J, Ngiam KY, An B, Ang TL, Yeoh KG, et al. Artificial intelligence for gastroenterology: Singapore artificial intelligence for Gastroenterology Working Group Position Statement. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Oct;38(10):1669-1676. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  11. Saccà R, Turrini R, Ausania F, Turrina S, De Leo D. The ménage à trois of healthcare: the actors in after-AI era under patient consent. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 8;10:1329087. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  12. Redrup Hill E, Mitchell C, Brigden T, Hall A. Ethical and legal considerations influencing human involvement in the implementation of artificial intelligence in a clinical pathway: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Front Digit Health. 2023 Mar 13;5:1139210. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  13. Mesinovic M, Watkinson P, Zhu T. Explainable AI for clinical risk prediction: a survey of concepts, methods, and modalities. 2023. [Crossref]
  14. Challen R, Denny J, Pitt M, Gompels L, Edwards T, Tsaneva-Atanasova K. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):231-237. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  15. Cirillo D, Catuara-Solarz S, Morey C, Guney E, Subirats L, Mellino S, et al. Sex and gender differences and biases in artificial intelligence for biomedicine and healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. Jun 01, 2020;3(1):81. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  16. Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med. Feb 6, 2020;3:17. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  17. Daneshjou R, Smith MP, Sun MD, Rotemberg V, Zou J. Lack of transparency and potential bias in artificial intelligence data sets and algorithms: a scoping review. JAMA Dermatol. Nov 01, 2021;157(11):1362-1369. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  18. Stewart C, Wong SKY, Sung JJY. Mapping ethico-legal principles for the use of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May;36(5):1143-1148. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  19. Terranova C, Cestonaro C, Fava L, Cinquetti A. AI and professional liability assessment in healthcare. A revolution in legal medicine? Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 8;10:1337335. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  20. Mennella C, Maniscalco U, De Pietro G, Esposito M. Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review. Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(4):e26297. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  21. Jassar S, Adams SJ, Zarzeczny A, Burbridge BE. The future of artificial intelligence in medicine: Medical-legal considerations for health leaders. Healthc Manage Forum. 2022 May;35(3):185-189. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  22. Abbasi N, Hussain HK. Integration of artificial intelligence and smart technology: AI-driven robotics in surgery: precision and efficiency. J Artif Intell Gen Sci. 2024;5(1):381-390. [Crossref]
  23. Murdoch B. Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 15;22(1):122. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  24. Bak M, Madai VI, Fritzsche MC, Mayrhofer MT, McLennan S. You Can't Have AI Both Ways: Balancing Health Data Privacy and Access Fairly. Front Genet. 2022 Jun 13;13:929453. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  25. Hryciw BN, Fortin Z, Ghossein J, Kyeremanteng K. Doctor-patient interactions in the age of AI: navigating innovation and expertise. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 30;10:1241508. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  26. Pasricha S. AI ethics in smart healthcare. 2022. [Link]
  27. Jarvis T, Thornburg D, Rebecca AM, Teven CM. Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: Current Applications, Future Directions, and Ethical Implications. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):e3200. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  28. Pressman SM, Borna S, Gomez-Cabello CA, Haider SA, Haider C, Forte AJ. AI and Ethics: A Systematic Review of the Ethical Considerations of Large Language Model Use in Surgery Research. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 13;12(8):825. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  29. Grezenko H, Alsadoun L, Farrukh A, Rehman A, Shehryar A, Nathaniel E, et al. From Nanobots to Neural Networks: Multifaceted Revolution of Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Medicine and Therapeutics. Cureus. 2023 Nov 19;15(11):e49082. [Crossref]