ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY

MaxillofacialSurgerydakapak

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES INDIGITAL ORTHOGNATHIC SURGICAL PLANNING DEFINITION, HISTORY, AND INNOVATION

Arif Yiğit Güler1
Özge Müftüoğlu Güler2

1Ankara Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ankara, Türkiye
2Ankara Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Ankara, Türkiye

Güler AY, Müftüoğlu Güler Ö. Innovative Approaches in Digital Orthognathic Surgical Planning Definition, History, and Innovation. Karasu HA, ed. Advanced Technologies in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1st ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2025. p.3340.

ABSTRACT

Orthognathic surgery is a method for the correction of dentofacial deformities. This field has devel oped significantly since its first application in the 19th century and has gained a modern dimension, especially with the introduction of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 1957. Traditional surgical plan ning methods are used for orthognathic surgery, but nowadays, with the development of technology, digital planning techniques have come to the forefront. Digital planning is performed with advanced technologies such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), intraoral scanning, and stereophoto grammetry. With these methods, preoperative skeletal and soft tissue analysis can be performed in 3D, surgical movements can be simulated, and patientspecific surgical splints can be produced. Digital techniques save time while reducing the risk of complications. In addition, innovative technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR), and virtual reality (VR) improve the accu racy and efficiency of surgical processes. These technologies allow surgeons to receive better guidance in preoperative planning and during surgery. These digital approaches increase the reliability of surgi cal outcomes and significantly improve patient satisfaction. However, challenges include high costs, infrastructure requirements, and technical expertise. In conclusion, digital planning and new technol ogies offer a modern dimension to orthognathic surgery and support multidisciplinary collaboration, enabling surgeons to offer better treatment options.

Keywords: Orthognathic surgery; Record jaw relation; ConeBeam computed tomography; Stereophotogrammetry; Photography dental

Referanslar

  1. Seo HJ, Choi Y-K. Current trends in orthognathic surgery. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2021;22:287-295. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  2. Halvorson EG, Mulliken JB. Cheever's double operation: the first Le Fort I osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121: 1375-1381. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  3. Trauner R, Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957;10:677-89. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  4. Schwartz HC. Does computer-aided surgical simulation improve efficiency in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:572-576. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  5. Sabev B, Abazi S, Patcas R, Hertig G, Meyer S, Rommers N, et al. Fully digital occlusion planning in orthognathic surgery- A crossover study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2024;52:1348-1353. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  6. Bell WH, Jacobs JD. Tridimensional planning for surgical/orthodontic treatment of mandibular excess. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:263-288. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  7. Hatamleh M, Turner C, Bhamrah G, Mack G, Osher J. Improved Virtual Planning for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27:e568-73. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  8. Dhabale GS, Bhowate RR. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Temporomandibular Joint Imaging. Cureus. 2022;14:e31515. [Crossref]
  9. Park SY, Hwang DS, Song JM, Kim UK. Comparison of time and cost between conventional surgical planning and virtual surgical planning in orthognathic surgery in Korea. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;41:35. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  10. Hong M, Kim MJ, Shin HJ, Cho HJ, Baek S-H. Three-dimensional surgical accuracy between virtually planned and actual surgical movements of the maxilla in two-jaw orthognathic surgery. Korean J Orthod. 2020;50:293-303. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  11. Tucker S, Cevidanes LHS, Styner M, Kim H, Reyes M, Proffit W, et al. Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:2412-2421. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  12. Alkhayer A, Piffkó J, Lippold C, Segatto E. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Head Face Med. 2020;16:34. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  13. Alkaabi S, Maningky M, Helder MN, Alsabri G. Virtual and traditional surgical planning in orthognathic surgery- systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;60:1184-1191. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  14. Bobek S, Farrell B, Choi C, Farrell B, Weimer K, Tucker M. Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: the charlotte method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:1143-1158. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  15. Donaldson CD, Manisali M, Naini FB. Three-dimensional virtual surgical planning (3D-VSP) in orthognathic surgery: Advantages, disadvantages and pitfalls. J Orthod. 2021;48:52-63. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  16. Petrides G, Clark JR, Low H, Lovell N, Eviston TJ. Three-dimensional scanners for soft-tissue facial assessment in clinical practice. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74:605-614. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  17. Alshammery FA. Three dimensional (3D) imaging techniques in orthodontics - An update. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9:2626-2630. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  18. Ho CT, Lin HH, Lo LJ. Intraoral Scanning and Setting Up the Digital Final Occlusion in Three-Dimensional Planning of Orthognathic Surgery: Its Comparison with the Dental Model Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143:1027e-1036e. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  19. Erten O, Yılmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod. 2018;31(3):86-94. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  20. Plooij JM, Maal TJJ, Haers P, Borstlap WA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bergé SJ. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:341-352. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  21. Brito HH de A, Mordente CM. Facial asymmetry: virtual planning to optimize treatment predictability and aesthetic results. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018;23: 80-89. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  22. Sahim S, Quars FE. Virtual planning versus traditional planning in orthodontic-surgical treatment: A review. OAlib. 2023;10:1-9. [Crossref]
  23. Monteiro Carneiro NC, Oliveira DV, Real FH, Karla da Silva Tabosa A, Carneiro Júnior JT. A new model of customized maxillary guide for orthognathic surgery: Precision analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020;48:1119-1125. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  24. Kim SH, Lee SM, Park JH, Yang S, Kim JW. Effectiveness of individualized 3D titanium-printed Orthognathic osteotomy guides and custom plates. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:255. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  25. Lee YC, Kim SG. Redefining precision and efficiency in orthognathic surgery through virtual surgical planning and 3D printing: a narrative review. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;45:42. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  26. Pampín Martínez MM, Gutiérrez Venturini A, Guiñales Díaz de Cevallos J, Barajas Blanco M, et al. Evaluation of the predictability and accuracy of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual surgical planning. Appl Sci (Basel). 2022;12:4305. [Crossref]
  27. Beek DM, Baan F, Liebregts J, Nienhuijs M, Bergé S, Maal T, et al. A learning curve in 3D virtual surgical planned orthognathic surgery. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:3907-3915. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  28. Kwon TG, Lee ST, Choi SY, Kim JW. Considerations for virtual surgical planning and simulation in orthognathic surgery-a narrative review. Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2020;2:27-27. [Crossref]
  29. Xue C, Tian Y, Wang L, Yang X, Luo E, Bai D. Surgical guide and CAD/CAM prebent titanium plate for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in the correction of mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:586-593. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  30. Jo YJ, Choi JS, Kim J, Kim HJ, Moon SY. Virtual reality (VR) simulation and augmented reality (AR) navigation in orthognathic surgery: A case report. Appl Sci (Basel). 2021;11:5673. [Crossref]
  31. De Riu G, Vaira LA, Ligas E, Vaittinen V, Spano G, Salzano G, et al. New protocol for in-house management of computer assisted orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;58:e265-e271. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  32. Gagnier D, Gregoire C, Brady J, Sterea A, Chaput T. Evaluation of a Fully Digital, In-House Virtual Surgical Planning Workflow for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;82:1038-1051.e1. [Crossref]  [PubMed]