OFFICE BASE TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOIDAL DISEASE

Merter Gülen

Atılım University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Türkiye

Gülen M. Office Base Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease. In: Ege B, editor. Hemorrhoidal Disease: Diagnosis, Treatment and Complication Management. 1st ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2025. p.73-78.

ABSTRACT

Hemorrhoidal disease is a prevalent condition marked by the symptomatic prolapse of vascular structures within the anal canal. Office-based procedures offer effective and minimally invasive treatment alternatives for patients with symptomatic grade I and II hemorrhoidal disease, as well as for certain patients with grade III hemorrhoidal disease that do not respond to conservative treatments. The most commonly employed office-based treatment techniques include rubber band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, and infrared coagulation. These procedures aim to correct hemorrhoidal prolapse, re-fix the tissue to the underlying structures, reduce vascularity, and eliminate redundant tissue. Rubber band ligation is widely used due to its efficacy, simplicity, and relatively low complication rates. Injection sclerotherapy, which involves the injection of sclerosing agents into the submucosa, is an effective and frequently preferred alternative. It is particularly suitable for patients with hemorrhoids complicated by bleeding, offering lower post-procedural pain and reduced complication risks. Infrared coagulation, although less effective than rubber band ligation, is typically linked to reduced post-procedural pain and complications, though it may require additional treatment sessions. The selection of treatment should consider individual factors such as the severity of hemorrhoidal disease, underlying comorbidities, and patient preferences. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons strongly endorses these office-based procedures for managing grade I and II hemorrhoidal disease and select grade III cases. In conclusion, office-based treatments offer safe and effective alternatives for managing hemorrhoidal disease, improving patient quality of life, and reducing the need for surgical interventions.

Keywords: Hemorrhoids; Sclerotherapy; ligation; Office management; Bleeding

Referanslar

  1. Sun Z, Migaly J. Review Of Hemorrhoid Disease: Prevention And Management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016; 29(1): 22-29. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  2. Hawkins AT, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2024;67(5):614-623. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  3. Lee HH, Spencer RJ, Beart RWJr. Multiple hemorrhoidal bandings in a single session. Dis Colon rectum. 1994;37:37-41. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  4. Albuquerque A. Rubber Band Ligation Of Hemorrhoids: A Guide For Complications. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;27;8:614-20. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  5. Odelowo OO, Mekasha G, Johnson MA. Massive life-threatening lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage following hemorrhoidal rubber band ligation. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94:1089-92. [PubMed]
  6. Gülen M, Emral Ac, Ege B. Hemoroid Lastik Band Ligasyonu Komplikasyonlarının Yönetimi: Masif Rektal Kanama. Namik Kemal Med J. 2024;12(1):40-44. [Crossref]
  7. Alonso-Coello p, Zhou Q et al. Meta-analysis of flavonoids fort he treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 2006; 93(8):909-920. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  8. Hollingshead JR, Phillips RK. Haemorrhoids:modern diagnosis and treatment. Postgrad Med J. 2016; 92(1083): 4-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  9. Cocorullo G, Tutino R, Falco N, Licari L, Orlando G, Fontana T et al. The non-surgical management for hemorrhoidal disease. A systematic review. Il Giornale Di Chirurgia 2017;38(1):5-14. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  10. Brown SR. Haemorrhoids: An Update On Management. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2017;8(10):141-147. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  11. Yano T, Yano K. Comparison Of Injection Sclerotherapy Between 5% Phenol In Almond Oil And Aluminum Potassium Sulfate And Tannic Acid For Grade 3 Hemorrhoids. Ann Coloproctol 2015;1(3):103-105. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  12. Mishra S, Sahoo Ak, Elamurugan Tp, Jagdish S. Polidocanol Versus Phenol in Oil Injection Sclerotherapy in Treatment of Internal Hemorrhoids: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Turk J Gastroenterol o
  13. ff J Turk Soc Gastroenterol 2020;31(5):378-383. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  14. Awad AE, Soliman HH, Saif SA, Darwish AM, Mosaad S, Elfert AA. A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study Of Endoscopic Band Ligation Versus Injection Sclerotherapy Of Bleeding Internal Haemorrhoids In Patients With Liver Cirrhosis. Arab J Gastroenterol Off Publ Pan-Arab Assoc Gastroenterol 2012;13(2):77-81. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  15. Cengiz TB, Gorgun E. Hemorrhoids: Arange of Treatments. Cleveland Clinic journal of edicine, 2019, 86(9), 612-620. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  16. Technology Committee ASGE, Siddiqui UD, Barth BA, et al. Devices for the endoscopic treatment of hemorrhoids. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:8-14. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  17. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysis Dis Colon rectum. 1995;38:687-94. [Crossref]  [PubMed]