Telehealth Applications in Surgical and Postoperative Care

halksagligi-10-1-2024-kapak

Kürşat DİKMENa , Saygın ALTINERb

aGazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Türkiye
bAnkara Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of General Surgery, Ankara, Türkiye

ABSTRACT
Today, the fields of use and prevalence of telehealth applications are developing rapidly along with information and communication technologies. This development also has important effects on the forms of surgical and postoperative care. Telesurgery can be classified under three different subheadings as telementoring, telepresence and telerobotics. Telerobotic techniques can contribute to the healthcare services provided to remote patients, and telementoring enables experience sharing between surgeons. Telepresence surgery allows surgeons to provide care to their patients as if they were there by recreating an illusion of the real environment in a remote location with a sense of reality. Telehealth applications play an important role in providing more accessible and quality healthcare services not only during surgery but also in pre- and postoperative processes. Telehealth offers significant benefits in areas such as postoperative patient follow-up, implementation of treatment plans and early detection of postoperative complications. In the future, increasing research in this field and making telehealth applications accessible to more patients will play an important role in the transformation of healthcare services.
Keywords: Surgery; postoperative care; telemedicine

Referanslar

  1. Huang EY, Knight S, Guetter CR, Davis CH, Moller M, Slama E, et al. Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: A narrative review. Am J Surg. 2019;218(4):760-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  2. Behmanesh A, Sadoughi F, Mazhar FN, Joghataei MT, Yazdani S. Tele-orthopaedics: A systematic mapping study. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(1):3-23. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  3. Gunter RL, Chouinard S, Fernandes-Taylor S, Wiseman JT, Clarkson S, Bennett K, et al. Current Use of Telemedicine for Post-Discharge Surgical Care: A Systematic Review. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(5):915-27. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  4. Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Alam HB, Nikolian VC. The role of telemedicine in postoperative care. Mhealth. 2018;4:11. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  5. Angelini L, Papaspyropoulos V. Telesurgery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26 Suppl 1:S45-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  6. Choi PJ, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS. Telesurgery: Past, Present, and Future. Cureus. 2018;10(5):e2716. [Crossref]
  7. Sood SP. Telesurgery. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering. Wiley; 2006. [Crossref]
  8. Xia SB, Lu QS. Development status of telesurgery robotic system. Chin J Traumatol. 2021;24(3):144-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  9. Bowersox JC, Cordts PR, LaPorta AJ. Use of an intuitive telemanipulator system for remote trauma surgery: an experimental study. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 186(6):615-21. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  10. Özman O. 5G Uzaktan Cerrahi. Özlü C, editör. Sağlıkta yeni nesil teknolojiler kitabı içinde. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2020. p.119-24.
  11. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature. 2001;413(6854):379-80. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  12. Anvari M, McKinley C, Stein H. Establishment of the world's first telerobotic remote surgical service: for provision of advanced laparoscopic surgery in a rural community. Ann Surg. 2005;241(3):460-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  13. Challacombe B, Patriciu A, Glass J, Aron M, Jarrett T, Kim F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of human versus robotic and telerobotic access to the kidney as the first step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Comput Aided Surg. 2005;10(3):165-71. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  14. Shahzad N, Chawla T, Gala T. Telesurgery prospects in delivering healthcare in remote areas. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019;69(Suppl 1)(1):S69-S71.
  15. Muaddi H, Hafid ME, Choi WJ, Lillie E, de Mestral C, Nathens A, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews. Ann Surg. 2021;273(3):467-73. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  16. Morrell ALG, Morrell-Junior AC, Morrell AG, Mendes JMF, Tustumi F, DE-Oliveira-E-Silva LG, et al. The history of robotic surgery and its evolution: when illusion becomes reality. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021;48:e20202798. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  17. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(10):1389-402. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  18. Satava RM, Jones SB. Preparing surgeons for the 21st century. Implications of advanced technologies. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80(4):1353-65. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  19. Eadie LH, Seifalian AM, Davidson BR. Telemedicine in surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90(6):647-58. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  20. Erridge S, Yeung DKT, Patel HRH, Purkayastha S. Telementoring of Surgeons: A Systematic Review. Surg Innov. 2019;26(1):95-111. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  21. Augestad KM, Bellika JG, Budrionis A, Chomutare T, Lindsetmo RO, Patel H, et al; Mobile Medical Mentor (M3) Project. Surgical telementoring in knowledge translation--clinical outcomes and educational benefits: a comprehensive review. Surg Innov. 2013;20(3):273-81. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  22. Bilgic E, Turkdogan S, Watanabe Y, Madani A, Landry T, Lavigne D, et al. Effectiveness of Telementoring in Surgery Compared With On-site Mentoring: A Systematic Review. Surg Innov. 2017;24(4):379-85. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  23. Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO. Overcoming distance: video-conferencing as a clinical and educational tool among surgeons. World J Surg. 2009; 33(7):1356-65. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  24. Santomauro M, Reina GA, Stroup SP, L'Esperance JO. Telementoring in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23(2):141-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  25. Lacy AM, Bravo R, Otero-Piñeiro AM, Pena R, De Lacy FB, Menchaca R, et al. 5G-assisted telementored surgery. Br J Surg. 2019;106(12):1576-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  26. Humm G, Harries RL, Stoyanov D, Lovat LB. Supporting laparoscopic general surgery training with digital technology: The United Kingdom and Ireland paradigm. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):123. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  27. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Franzen J, Bollmann S, Koch OO, Pointner R, et al. A comprehensive review of telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2111-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  28. Ponce BA, Jennings JK, Clay TB, May MB, Huisingh C, Sheppard ED. Telementoring: use of augmented reality in orthopaedic education: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(10):e84. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  29. Canon S, Shera A, Patel A, Zamilpa I, Paddack J, Fisher PL, et al. A pilot study of telemedicine for post-operative urological care in children. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(8):427-30. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  30. Gan Z, Lee SY, Weiss DA, Van Batavia J, Siu S, Frazier J, et al. Single institution experience with telemedicine for pediatric urology outpatient visits: Adapting to COVID-19 restrictions, patient satisfaction, and future utilization. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(4):480.e1-480.e7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  31. Dhruva V, Grech D. The Utility of Telemedicine to Manage Post-Operative Pain. Open Journal of Anesthesiology. 2022;12:229-39. [Crossref]
  32. Sartori DJ, Hayes RW, Horlick M, Adams JG, Zabar SR. The TeleHealth OSCE: Preparing Trainees to Use Telemedicine as a Tool for Transitions of Care. J Grad Med Educ. 2020;12(6):764-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  33. Pollard TJ, Johnson AEW, Raffa JD, Celi LA, Mark RG, Badawi O. The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research. Sci Data. 2018;5:180178. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]