Types of Fixed Restorations in Digital Prosthodontics

Mehmet Esat Başol
Phd, Private Practice, Mehmet Esat Başol Clinic, Ankara, Türkiye

ABSTRACT
Digital dentistry has transformed the production of fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) by enhancing accuracy, speed, cost efficiency, and overall workflow. Firstly, it ensures precise fit through digital impressions and com-puterized milling or printing, minimizing adjustments during seating. Secondly, it enables rapid design and fabrication, reducing treatment time and enabling same-day restorations. Thirdly, despite initial investment costs, long-term savings are significant due to streamlined processes and reduced manual labor. Lastly, au-tomation improves efficiency by eliminating errors, allowing focus on patient care. Integration with intraoral scanners completes a digital workflow, further enhancing cost reduction, time efficiency, and treatment out-comes. Overall, CAD/CAM technology, combined with other digital tools, offers multiple benefits, making it indispensable in modern dental practice.
Keywords: Digital Workflow, Fixed Prosthodontics, Digital Impression

Referanslar

  1. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):624-39. [Crossref]
  2. Rosenstiel SF. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016.
  3. Hogan R, Goodwin M, Boothman N, Iafolla T, Pretty IA. Further opportunities for digital imaging in dental epidemiology. J Dent. 2018;74:S2-9. [Crossref]
  4. Liang H, Tsui BY, Ni H, Valentim CCS, Baxter SL, Liu G, Cai W, Kermany DS, Sun X, Chen J, et al. Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of paediatric diseases using artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:433-8. [Crossref]
  5. Joda T, Bornstein MM, Jung RE, Ferrari M, Waltimo T, Zitzmann NU. Recent trends and future direction of dental research in the digital era. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1987. [Crossref]
  6. Podhorsky A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Tooth preparation for full-coverage restorations- a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(5):959-68. [Crossref]
  7. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(4):363-76. [Crossref]
  8. Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28:3-12. [Crossref]
  9. Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, Farges JC, Fages M, Ducret M. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595. [Crossref]
  10. Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Stampf S, Att W. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014a;145(11):1133-40. [Crossref]
  11. Kim J, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Shin IH, Kim M. Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2016b;116(2):221-30. [Crossref]
  12. Jutta Brodesser Tapie L, Lebon N, Mawussi B, Fron Chabouis H, Duret F, Attal JP. Understanding dental CAD/CAM for restorations - the digital workflow from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(1):21-44.
  13. Sason G, Mistry G, Tabassum R, Shetty O. A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: an in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018;18:108-16. [Crossref]
  14. Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013;144(3):471-8. [Crossref]
  15. Solaberrieta E, Otegi JR, Mínguez R, Etxaniz O. Improved digital transfer of the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(4):921-4. [Crossref]
  16. Mandikos MN. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use. Aust Dent J. 1998;43:428-34. [Crossref]
  17. Joda T, Ferrari M, Gallucci GO, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontol. 2017;73(1):178-92. [Crossref]
  18. Ferreira F, Zaror C, Navarro P, Sandoval P. In vitro evaluation of T-scan® III through study of the sensels. Cranio. 2016;33(4):300-6. [Crossref]
  19. Solaberrieta E, Garmendia A, Brizuela A, Otegi JR, Pradies G, Szentpétery A. Intraoral digital impressions for virtual occlusal records: section quantity and dimensions. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7. [Crossref]
  20. Park ME, Shin SY. Three-dimensional comparative study on the accuracy and reproducibility of dental casts fabricated by 3D printers. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(5):861.e1-7. [Crossref]
  21. Papaspyridakos P, Kang K, DeFuria C, Amin S, Kudara Y, Weber HP. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(1):5-13. [Crossref]
  22. Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(1):43-8. [Crossref]
  23. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204(9):505-11. [Crossref]
  24. Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: a systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):545-51. [Crossref]
  25. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(9 Suppl):22S-31S. [Crossref]
  26. Cho SH, Schaefer O, Thompson GA, Guentsch A. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(4):310-5. [Crossref]
  27. Lin WS, Zandinejad A, Metz MJ, Harris BT, Morton D. Predictable restorative work flow for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture-fabricated ceramic veneers utilizing a virtual smile design principle. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):357-63. [Crossref]
  28. Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF. Clinical applications of digital dental technology. 1st ed: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015.
  29. Freedman GA Contemporary esthetic dentistry. London, England: Mosby 2012, chapter 17, 469-70.
  30. Pol CWP, Raghoebar GM, Kerdijk W, Boven GC, Cune MS, Meijer HJA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses: are the results of 2 abutment implants comparable to the results of 2 abutment teeth? J Oral Rehabil. 2017;45(2):147-60. [Crossref]
  31. Sailer I, Balmer M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Känel S, Thoma DS. 10-Year randomized trial (RCT) of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2018;76:32-9. [Crossref]
  32. Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, Kern M. Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results. Dent Mater. 2009;25(9):e63-71. [Crossref]
  33. Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(7):552-7. [Crossref]
  34. Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(1):22-30. [Crossref]
  35. Saintrain MV, de Souza EH. Impact of tooth loss on the quality of life. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):e632-6. [Crossref]
  36. Akalin ZF, Ozkan YK, Ekerim A. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(1):149-57. [Crossref]