Usage of Digital Systems in Color Selection of Prosthetic Restorations

Zeynep İrkeç
Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics,
Faculty of Dentistry, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Türkiye

ABSTRACT
Aesthetics are of great importance in dentistry and prosthetic restorations today, as in every field. Bringing optical properties closer to natural aesthetics, as well as morphological and biological compatibility, has be-come the main factor in the success of restorations. However, the complicated optical structure of natural teeth continues to be a factor that greatly affects the color selection of prosthetic restorations and a difficult choice in achieving aesthetic success. In connection with this, many devices that provide color evaluation continue to be constantly developed. In order to increase prosthetic success, knowing the characteristics of color, the factors that determine the structural color characteristics of the tooth, the situations that affect col-or perception and technological devices will provide the opportunity to get closer to appropriate aesthetics.
Keywords: Aesthetics, Color Perception, Digital Technology

Referanslar

  1. Yoon HI, Bae JW, Park JM, et al. A study on possibility of clinical application for color measurements of shade guides using an intraoral digital scanner. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:670-675. [Crossref]
  2. Cal E, Güneri P, Köse T. Comparison of digital and spectrophotometric measurements of colour shade guides. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:221-228. [Crossref]
  3. Pustina-Krasniqi T, Shala K, Staka G, et al. Lightness, chroma, and hue distributions in natural teeth measured by a spectrophotometer. Eur J Dent. 2017;11:36-40. [Crossref]
  4. Tabatabaian F, Beyabanaki E, Alirezaei P, Epakchi S. Visual and digital tooth selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: A literatüre review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33:1084-1104. [Crossref]
  5. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: A review. Dent Mater. 2011;27:97-108. [Crossref]
  6. Akl MA, Mansour DE, Zheng F. The role of intraoral scanners in the shade matching process: A systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2023;32:196-203. [Crossref]
  7. Imbery TA, Killough C, Baechle MA, et al. An evaluation of factors affecting dental shade matching in first-year dental students. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(3);489-495. [Crossref]
  8. Sheets JL, Marx DB, Ariani N, et al. Faculty versus student repeatability on evaluating translucency of the anterior dentition. Prosthesis. 2021;3:331-341. [Crossref]
  9. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. 12th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier. 2006;28-31.
  10. Rutkūnas V, Dirsè J, Bilius V. Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123;322-329. [Crossref]
  11. Paravina RD, Majkic G, Imai FH, Powers JM. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design. J Prosthodont. 2007;16:269-276. [Crossref]
  12. Caglar A, Yamanel K, Gulsahi K, et al. Could digital imaging be an alternative for digital colorimeters? Clin Oral Invest. 2010;14:713-718. [Crossref]
  13. Suliman S, Sulaiman TA, Olafsson VG, et al. Effect of time on tooth dehydration and rehydration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31:118-123. [Crossref]
  14. Czigola A, Róth I, Vitai V, at al. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33:1166-1174. [Crossref]
  15. Liberato WF, Barreto IC, Costa PP, et al. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:271- 275. [Crossref]
  16. Brandt J, Nelson S, Lauer HC, et al. In vivo study for tooth colour determination-visual versus digital. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21:2863-2871. [Crossref]
  17. Olms C, Setz JM. The repeatability of digital shade measurement-a clinical study. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17:1161-1166. [Crossref]
  18. Stevenson B, Ibbetson R. The effect of the substructure on the colour of samples/restorations veneered with ceramic: a literature review. J Dent. 2010;38:361-368. [Crossref]
  19. Kourtis SG, Tripodakis AP, Doukoudakis AA. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of different metal alloys and porcelains in the metal-ceramic complex. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:477-485. [Crossref]
  20. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, et al. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. I. Core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:4-9. [Crossref]
  21. Volpato CA, Monteiro Jr S, de Andrada MC, et al. Optical influence of the type of illuminants, substrates and thickness of ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25:87-93. [Crossref]
  22. Bücking W. Die fehlerfreie Zahnfarbenbestimmung-eine. Her-ausforderung für Zahnarzt und Zahntechniker: Quintess. 2006;53:1199-1207.
  23. Jorquera GJ, Atria PJ, Galán M, et al. A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods: Visual, digital camera, and smartphone. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(4):784-792. [Crossref]
  24. Mahn E, Tortora SC, Olate B, et al. Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching. 2021;125(3):511-516. [Crossref]
  25. Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, et al. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(2):93-100. [Crossref]
  26. Gomez-Polo C, Gomez-Polo M, Celemin-Vinuela A, Martinez Vazquez De Parga JA. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour. J Dent. 2014;42(6):742-745. [Crossref]
  27. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38(2):2-16. [Crossref]
  28. Khurana R, Tredwin CJ, Weisbloom M, et al. A clinical evaluation of the individual repeatability of three commercially available colour measuring devices. Br Dent J. 2007;22(203):675-680. [Crossref]
  29. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(3):193-199. [Crossref]
  30. Ragain J. A review of color science in dentistry: shade matching in the contemporary dental practice. J Dent Oral Disord Ther. 2016;4:1-5. [Crossref]
  31. Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Kuo S, Johnston WM. Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2006;22:553-559. [Crossref]
  32. Stevenson B. Current methods of shade matching in dentistry: a review of the supporting literature. Dent Update. 2009;36:270-276. [Crossref]
  33. Gasparik C, Grecu AG, Culic B, et al. Shadematching performance using a new lightcorrecting device. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27:285-292. [Crossref]
  34. Sampaio CS, Gurrea J, Gurrea M, et al. Dental shade guide variability for hues B, C, and D using cross-polarized photography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38:113- 118. [Crossref]
  35. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, et al. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng. 2014;54:203-221. [Crossref]
  36. Pawley JB. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. 3 ed. New York: Springer; 2006. [Crossref]
  37. Schmitt JM. Optical coherence tomography (OCT): A review. IEEE J. Sel Top Quantum Electron. 1999;5:1205-1215. [Crossref]
  38. Ebeid K, Sabet A, Della Bona A. Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral scanners on shade determination. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;1-5. [Crossref]
  39. Kakapoyi AS, Pattanaik S, Pattanaik B, Shaikh N. Digital scanners in prosthodontics: A literature review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2021;7(2):554-557. [Crossref]
  40. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1759-1764. [Crossref]
  41. Gotfredsen K, Gram M, Ben Brahem E, et al. Effectiveness of shade measurements using a scanning and computer software system: a pilot study. Int J Oral Dent Health. 2015;1:25. [Crossref]
  42. Olms C, Setz JM. The repeatability of digital shade measurement - a clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1161- 1166. [Crossref]
  43. Moussaoui H, El Mdaghri M, Gouma A, Bennani A. Accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of digital intraoral scanner for shade selection: Current status of the literature. J Oral Health Dent Sci. 2019;3(1):1-6. [Crossref]
  44. Sarafianou A, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, et al. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:178-185. [Crossref]
  45. Karamouzos A, Papadopoulos MA, Kolokithas G, et al. Precision of in vivo spectrophotometric colour evaluation of natural teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:613-621. [Crossref]
  46. Goracci C, Franchi L, Vichi A, et al. Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impresions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38:422-428. [Crossref]
  47. Mohammed A, Mansour DE, Zheng F. The role of intraoral scanners in the shade matching process: A systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2023;32:196-203. [Crossref]
  48. Culic C, Varvara M, Tatar G, et al. In vivo evaluation of teeth shade matching capabilities of dental intraoral scanner. Curr Health Sci J. 2018;44:337-341.
  49. Mehl A, Bosch G, Fischer C, et al. In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods. Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20:343-361.
  50. Hampé-Kautz V, Salehi A, Senger B, et al. A comparative in vivo study of new shade matching prodecures. Int J Comput Dent. 2020;23:317-323.