USG-GUIDED PROCEDURES IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

Orhun Demir

Lokman Hekim University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara, Türkiye

Demir O. USG-Guided Procedures in Intensive Care Unit. In: Turan S, editor. Hard Decisions in Intensive Care Unit. 1st ed. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2025. p.459-469.

ABSTRACT

Ultrasound is widely used in intensive care units to provide guidance during interventional procedures and to facilitate diagnostic processes. Its advantages include portability, quick results, lack of radiation, and low cost, whereas its disadvantages include operator dependency and patient-related factors. The central venous catheter placement procedure is frequently performed under ultrasound guidance in intensive care. Using ultrasound increases the first-attempt success rate and overall success while reducing complications. Similarly, it has been noted to improve success rates and reduce complication risks in radial and femoral artery cannulations. Although convex probes may be necessary for morbidly obese patients, high-frequency linear probes are typically used for these procedures, when targeting the femoral vein. Ultrasound-guided vascular techniques may reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections due to advantages such as fewer interventions, shorter procedure time, and the use of appropriate sterile techniques. Pericardiocentesis under ultrasound guidance is preferred due to its high success rate and low risk of complications. The nature of the effusion and surrounding structures is carefully evaluated during the procedure. Intercostal or subcostal approaches are performed under sterile conditions, and lung sliding should be checked after the intercostal approach. Ultrasound guidance in pleural effusions helps reduce complications, such as pneumothorax and ensures high success. Thoracentesis can be performed using static or real-time ultrasound guidance. Prior to the procedure, effusion characteristics and target area are thoroughly examined, and drainage is performed using static or dynamic techniques. Paracentesis under ultrasound guidance ensures the successful drainage of free peritoneal fluid and reduces risk of complications. Free peritoneal fluid is commonly observed in ICU patients, especially in cases of small fluid collections or obesity, where real-time ultrasound guidance is recommended. Ultrasound guidance during lumbar puncture reduces the number of attempts required and minimizes risk of complications, particularly in cases of anatomical challenges. Post-procedural complications may include post-dural puncture headache, traumatic puncture, bleeding, infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, dural injury, and allergic reactions. Ultrasound plays a crucial role in diagnostic and therapeutic processes in ICU settings by, effectively reducing complications and improving procedural success rates.

Keywords: Intensive care units; Ultrasonography; Interventional; Vascular access devices; Complication; Spinal puncture

Referanslar

  1. Robba C, Wong A, Poole D, Al Tayar A, Arntfield RT, Chew MS, et al. Basic ultrasound head-to-toe skills for intensivists in the general and neuro intensive care unit population: consensus and expert recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(12):1347-1367. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  2. Blanco P, Miralles Aguiar F, Vallejo A. Point-of-care ultrasonography in critical care medicine: a one way directional road. J Ultrasound. 2016;19(2):157-158. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  3. Blanco P, Abdo-Cuza A, Palomares EA, Díaz CM, Gutiérrez VF. Ultrasonography and procedures in intensive care medicine. Medicina Intensiva (English Edition). 2023;47(12):717-732. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  4. Manno E, Navarra M, Faccio L, Motevallian M, Bertolaccini L, Mfochivè A, et al. Deep Impact of Ultrasound in the Intensive Care Unit. Anesthesiology. 2012;117(4):801-809. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  5. Orme RML, Oram MP, McKinstry CE. Impact of echocardiography on patient management in the intensive care unit: an audit of district general hospital practice. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(3):340-344. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  6. Bouaziz H, Zetlaoui PJ, Pierre S, Desruennes E, Fritsch N, Jochum D, et al. Guidelines on the use of ultrasound guidance for vascular access. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015;34(1):65-69. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  7. Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, Schick G, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;2018(12). [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  8. Lamperti M, Biasucci DG, Disma N, Pittiruti M, Breschan C, Vailati D, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound-guided for vascular access (PERSEUS vascular access). Eur J Anaesthesiol.2020;37(5):344-376. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  9. Li J, Fan YY, Xin MZ, Yan J, Hu W, Huang WH, Lin XL, Qin HY. A randomised, controlled trial comparing the long-term effects of peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy patients using B-mode ultrasound with modified Seldinger technique versus blind puncture. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2014;18(1):94-103. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  10. Galen B, Baron S, Young S, Hall A, Berger-Spivack L, Southern W. Reducing peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters by training nurses in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement. BMJ Qual Saf.2020;29(3):245-249. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  11. Franco-Sadud R, Schnobrich D, Mathews BK, Candotti C, Abdel-Ghani S, Perez MG, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Central and Peripheral Vascular Access in Adults: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(9). [Crossref]
  12. Kehagias E, Galanakis N, Tsetis D. Central venous catheters: Which, when and how. Br J Radiol. 2023;96(1151). [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  13. Brederlau J, Greim C, Schwemmer U, Haunschmid B, Markus C, Roewer N. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein in critically ill patients positioned in 30° dorsal elevation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21(9):684-687. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  14. Millington SJ, Hendin A, Shiloh AL, Koenig S. Better With Ultrasound. Chest. 2020;157(2):369-375. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  15. Korsten P, Mavropoulou E, Wienbeck S, Ellenberger D, Patschan D, Zeisberg M, et al. The "rapid atrial swirl sign" for assessing central venous catheters: Performance by medical residents after limited training. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0199345. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  16. Weekes AJ, Keller SM, Efune B, Ghali S, Runyon M. Prospective comparison of ultrasound and CXR for confirmation of central vascular catheter placement. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2016;33(3):176-180. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  17. Xu H, Hyun A, Mihala G, Rickard CM, Cooke ML, Lin F, et al. The effectiveness of dressings and securement devices to prevent central venous catheter-associated complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024;149:104620. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  18. Takeshita J, Tachibana K, Nakajima Y, Shime N. Incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections following ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):772. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  19. Boulet N, Pensier J, Occean BV, Peray PF, Mimoz O, Rickard CM, et al. Central venous catheter-related infections: a systematic review, meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and meta-regression comparing ultrasound guidance and landmark technique for insertion. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):378. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  20. Moussa Pacha H, Alahdab F, Al-Khadra Y, Idris A, Rabbat F, Darmoch F, Soud M, Zaitoun A, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided radial artery catheterization in adult population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2018;204:1-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  21. Flumignan RL, Trevisani VF, Lopes RD, Baptista-Silva JC, Flumignan CD, Nakano LC. Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021;2021(10). [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  22. Yilmaztepe MA, Yilmaz E. Effect of transient ulnar artery compression on radial artery diameter. Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(4):3735-3739. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  23. Alaeddin H, Elsaadany A, Rashid Akhtar M. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous retrieval of non-radiopaque radial line using a microsnare. CVIR Endovasc. 2023;6(1):59. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  24. Blanco P, Figueroa L, Menéndez MF, Berrueta B. Pericardiocentesis: ultrasound guidance is essential. Ultrasound J. 2022;14(1):9. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  25. Blanco P, Bello G. Agitated saline echo testing: Two useful indications in critical care patients. Med Intensiva.2019;43(2):124-125. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  26. Maslove DM, Chen BTM, Wang H, Kuschner WG. The Diagnosis and Management of Pleural Effusions in the ICU. J Intensive Care Med. 2013;28(1):24-36. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  27. Shao RJ, Du MJ, Xie JT. Use of lung ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of pleural effusion. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(23):8771-8776. [PubMed]
  28. Dancel R, Schnobrich D, Puri N, Franco-Sadud R, Cho J, Grikis L, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Thoracentesis: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(2):126-135. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  29. Mercaldi CJ, Lanes SF. Ultrasound Guidance Decreases Complications and Improves the Cost of Care Among Patients Undergoing Thoracentesis and Paracentesis. Chest. 2013;143(2):532-538. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  30. Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(2):61-76. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  31. Millington SJ, Koenig S. Better With Ultrasound. Chest. 2018;153(1):224-232. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  32. Jayakrishnan B, Kashoob M, Al-Sukaiti R, Al-Mubaihsi S, Kakaria A, Al-Ghafri A, et al. Percutaneous Ultrasound-guided Pigtail Catheter for Pleural Effusions: Efficacy and Safety. Oman Med J. 2021;35(2):248-248. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  33. Volpicelli G, Lamorte A, Tullio M, Boero E, Stefanone V. Worsening Dyspnea and Cough Following Thoracentesis. Chest. 2013;144(2):1-3. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  34. Mercaldi CJ, Lanes SF. Ultrasound Guidance Decreases Complications and Improves the Cost of Care Among Patients Undergoing Thoracentesis and Paracentesis. Chest. 2013;143(2):532-538. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  35. Cho J, Jensen TP, Reierson K, Mathews BK, Bhagra A, Franco-Sadud R, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Abdominal Paracentesis: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med.2019;14(1). [Crossref]
  36. Millington SJ, Koenig S. Better With Ultrasound. Chest. 2018;154(1):177-184. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  37. Agah S, Tavakoli S, Nikbakht H, Najafi M, Al-agha A. Central venous pressure catheter for large-volume paracentesis in refractory ascites. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;33(4):310-315. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  38. Shaikh F, Brzezinski J, Alexander S, Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Beyene J, et al. Ultrasound imaging for lumbar punctures and epidural catheterisations: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346(26 1):f1720-f1720. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  39. Soni NJ, Franco-Sadud R, Kobaidze K, Schnobrich D, Salame G, Lenchus J, et al. Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Lumbar Puncture: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(10):591-601. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  40. Locks G de F, de Almeida MCS, Pereira AA. Use of the Ultrasound to Determine the Level of Lumbar Puncture in Pregnant Women. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2010;60(1):13-19. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  41. Shaikh F, Brzezinski J, Alexander S, Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Beyene J, et al. Ultrasound imaging for lumbar punctures and epidural catheterisations: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346(26 1):1720-1720. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  42. Reis AE, Spano M, Davis-Hayes C, Salama GR. Lumbar Puncture Complications: A Review of Current Literature. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024;28(8):803-813. [Crossref]  [PubMed]
  43. Karasu D, Yılmaz C, Baytar Ç, Korfalı G. Retrospective Analysis of Percutaneous Tracheostomi Cases in Intensive Care Unit. J Turk Soc Intens Care. 2018 Dec;16(3):83-87. [Crossref]
  44. Griggs WM, Worthley LI, Gilligan JE, Thomas PD, Myburg JA. A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170(6):543-5. [PubMed]
  45. Kumar P, Kumar S, Hussain M, Singh R, Ahmed W, Anand R. Comparison of percutaneous tracheostomy methods in ICU patients: Conventional anatomical landmark method versus ultrasonography method - A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2022;66(4):S207-S212. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]
  46. Kumar P, Govil D, Patel SJ, Jagadeesh KN, Gupta S, Srinivasan S, et al. Percutaneous Tracheostomy under Real-time Ultrasound Guidance in Coagulopathic Patients: A Single-center Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(2):122-127. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]